CyberArena: Benchmarking AI Agents in Live Symmetric Attack-and-Defense Combat
Abstract
CyberArena is a dynamic adversarial benchmark that evaluates AI agents through concurrent multi-round attack-and-defense combat in evolving environments, measuring capabilities via a dynamical scoring model.
AI agents are demonstrating increasingly strong offensive and defensive cybersecurity capabilities in the real world. Current benchmarks mostly evaluate agents in isolation against static targets. Real cyber operations, however, are dynamic and coupled: security postures constantly change as attackers and defenders adapt to each other in real time. Static benchmarks quickly saturate and miss an agent's ability to attack and defend simultaneously under live pressure. To address this gap, we present CyberArena, a dynamic, symmetric adversarial benchmark built around multi-round attack-and-defense combat. In isolated sandboxes, two agents compete under identical rules, acting concurrently as both attackers and defenders over continuously changing services. This converts static targets into evolving, semi-open challenges, directly testing an agent's speed and precision in discovering, exploiting, and patching vulnerabilities. To sustain the benchmark's longevity, an automated agentic pipeline continuously generates, reviews, and validates new environments. Furthermore, because pairwise contests are notoriously hard to quantify, we introduce a dynamical model that maps match dynamics into unified, multidimensional scores across offensive, defensive, and domain-specific capabilities. Evaluating 12 frontier LLM agents across 40 challenges in 466 matches, CyberArena separates model capabilities where single-agent baselines hit a ceiling. The trajectories read like a fight rather than an exam: defenders patch one hole and miss the next and certify repairs on stale evidence, while capable agents think a move ahead, planting backdoors for later rounds and, in one case, writing their own packet sniffer to watch the opponent. Beyond a benchmark, CyberArena serves as an adaptable, scalable experimental platform for future research on cybersecurity agents.
Community
βοΈ We are pleased to introduce CyberArena, where we benchmark 12 frontier AI agents via letting them combat with each other in live attack-and-defense security contests.
Previous security benchmarks for AI agents present a fixed target and measure whether the agent breaks in. In CyberArena, two agents play live attack-and-defense CTF: each attacks its opponent's service while patching its own, over several rounds, and the arena verifies every capture.
To measure what this setting changes, we ran 466 ranked games on 40 challenges, 14 adapted from classic CTF tasks and 26 built on real-world vulnerabilities in open-source software.
π GPT-5.6 Sol ranks first at 79%, followed by Claude Opus 5 (74%) and GLM-5.3 (69%). The top two also lead on defense: they retain their flag in 83% and 81% of rounds, compared with 43β61% for the remaining agents.
π A live defender also changes what counts as "solved." Three frontier models each solve the same 30 challenges against an undefended service, so a static benchmark cannot separate them. Against a live defender, their capture rates fall to 35β52% by round 3, and the models separate.
π This work is a collaboration with Berkeley RDI, together with colleagues at UC Santa Cruz, UC Santa Barbara, UWβMadison, MIT, the University of Toronto, Johns Hopkins, CMU, Purdue and Texas A&M.
At 2077AI.com, we build open benchmarks that show both what frontier models can do and where they fall short. In that spirit, CyberArena's engine, challenges and match replays are open source and available on GitHub.
π Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19005
π Homepage: https://cyber-arena.ai
π» GitHub: https://github.com/cyber-arena-ai/cyber-arena
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.19005 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper